The effects of two different resistive loading patterns on strength, hypertrophy, anaerobic power and endurance in young wrestlers

(Die Auswirkung von zwei unterschiedlichen Krafttrainingsmustern auf Kraft, Hypertrophie, anaerobe Leistungsfähigkeit und Ausdauer junger Ringer)

The present study investigates the effects of two types of loading patterns in resistance training. A double- pyramid loading pattern (DP) and a reverse step loading pattern (RS) were employed to study their effects on selected physiologic abilities of young wrestlers. For this purpose, 22 wrestlers volunteered to participate. Subjects (age 17.30 +/- 2.42 years; height 170.41 +/- 6.14 cm; weight 72.29+/-13 Kg; and BF% 12.39 +/-7.39) had a history of at least 6 months of wrestling training. The subjects were randomly divided into 3 groups; a control group (n=8), and two resistance training groups: a group using the DP loading pattern (n=7); and a group using the RS loading pattern (n=7). The subjects trained for 8 weeks using two selected loading patterns. In DP, subjects trained with 4/80%, 3/85%, 2/90%, 1/95%, 1/95%, 2/90%, 3/85%, 4/80%. In RS, subjects trained with 2/90%, 10/70%, 15/60%, 2/90%, 10/70%, 15/60%. To study the variables, the ANOVA test and Tukey's post-hoc test were used. The results of a 1RM strength test did not indicate any significant differences between the two training groups on upper and lower body muscles; however, this difference was significant for the control group (P . 0.05). In a muscular endurance test for lower body muscles, the difference between all 3 groups was significant, and this significance was greatest for the RS group; however, the difference between the two training groups of DP and RS in the upper body was not significant (P . 0.05). The results of muscular mass indicated that no significant difference existed between the training groups. However, the difference between two groups of training and the control group was significant (P . 0.05). Studying the statistical test for "leg-power" indicated that no significant difference existed between the 3 groups; however, the difference between two groups of DP and RS was significant (P . 0.05). In conclusion, it seems that both training models, were suitable for increasing strength, endurance, muscle mass and muscular power; and almost have similar benefit in physiologic factors of the athletes. However if the aim is increasing strength along with increasing muscular endurance, the RS model is more appropriate.
© Copyright 2012 International Journal of Wrestling Science. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Schlagworte: Ringen Freier Ringkampf Klassischer Ringkampf Nachwuchsleistungssport Jugend Training Trainingsmethode Kraft Trainingsprogramm Relation Leistung anaerob Ausdauer Kraftausdauer Muskel Belastungsgestaltung Trainingsplanung Trainingsperiodisierung
Notationen: Nachwuchssport Kampfsportarten
Veröffentlicht in: International Journal of Wrestling Science
Veröffentlicht: 2012
Jahrgang: 2
Heft: 1
Seiten: 41-47
Dokumentenarten: Artikel
Sprache: Englisch
Level: hoch